Use cases

Workflow decision guide

eDiscovery review

Faster review, privilege triage, and issue discovery across legal document sets.

Legal and ComplianceHigh effortHigh risk4-8 weeks
1

Mapped tools

Start with workflow fit. Use tools only after the inputs, review point, and success metric are clear.

When to use this

Use this when ediscovery review would directly improve large document populations, slow review queues, and missed issue clusters.

It is a good pilot candidate when the work happens often, has a clear owner, and can be tested with recent real examples.

Expected impact

Measure the pilot with documents reviewed, issue precision, and attorney review time.

The expected impact should be visible in faster cycle time, fewer manual corrections, or more consistent work quality.

Risk check

Treat this as a controlled pilot with strict scope, approved inputs, and clear escalation rules.

Avoid sensitive data early, and require human approval before outputs affect customers, employees, finances, or compliance decisions.

Implementation checklist

Define review criteria with legal owners
Run AI review on a validated sample
Compare results against expert coding

Required inputs

These inputs make the pilot more measurable and reduce tool switching later.

Matter scope
Review protocol
Custodian data
Quality sample

Tool shortlist

Best mapped tools for this use case

Open top tool
Relativity aiR logo

Relativity aiR

Legal

86

Relativity aiR is mapped to ediscovery review based on current curated use-case data.

Teams with a clear workflow and budget for a paid tool.

Paid